The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
FT Edit: Access on iOS and web
，这一点在快连下载-Letsvpn下载中也有详细论述
В КСИР выступили с жестким обращением к США и Израилю22:46，更多细节参见91视频
The free version is ideal for basic spelling and grammatical mistakes, but it does not correct advanced writing issues.
// Synchronous transforms